A Brief Review
A Connecticut Appellate Law Blog
TOPICS:
- A Brief Review (21)
- Abuse of discretion (2)
- Adequate record for review (4)
- Administrative appeal (1)
- Alternative grounds for affirmance (3)
- Appeal deadlines (1)
- Appellant (7)
- Appellate motions (4)
- Appellate process (8)
- Appellate stay (2)
- Appellee (3)
- Breach of contract (1)
- Child support appeals (1)
- Civil appeals (3)
- Comparative negligence (1)
- Complaint (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Connecticut Appellate Court (9)
- Connecticut Practice Book (8)
- Connecticut Rules of Appellate Procedure (8)
- Connecticut Supreme Court (2)
- Constructive notice (1)
- CORE 4 (3)
- Custody and visitation (1)
- Family appeals (4)
- Golding (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Issue preservation (4)
- Land use (1)
- Motion for articulation (1)
- Motion for review (1)
- Motion to dismiss (1)
- Motion to open (1)
- Motion to reargue (3)
- Negligence (2)
- Personal injury (2)
- Plain error (1)
- Pleadings (1)
- Plenary review (1)
- Post-judgment motions (4)
- Preliminary appeal papers (2)
- Premises liability (1)
- Probate appeals (1)
- Standing (2)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Subject matter jurisdiction (3)
- Supervisory authority (1)
- Trial court motions (2)
- Trial strategy (1)
- Unpreserved issues (1)
- Workers' compensation insurance law (1)
- Zoning (1)
- Firm News (16)
Category: Abuse of discretion
-
Most attorneys advising a client after a probate decree focus on the facts, the equities, or the perceived wrongdoing that occurred in the estate. But Moore v. Ferguson is a reminder that even serious allegations may never be reviewed if a plaintiff lacks standing, misses a Connecticut appellate deadline, or misses the deadline to file
-
In Cardona v. Padilla, the Connecticut Appellate Court considered whether the trial court abused its discretion in making its custody and visitation orders, which substantially limited the non-custodial parent’s access to parenting time with the child. In this family appeal, the Appellate Court held that the trial court abused its discretion because the trial court