A Brief Review
A Connecticut Appellate Law Blog
TOPICS:
- A Brief Review (21)
- Abuse of discretion (2)
- Adequate record for review (4)
- Administrative appeal (1)
- Alternative grounds for affirmance (3)
- Appeal deadlines (1)
- Appellant (7)
- Appellate motions (4)
- Appellate process (8)
- Appellate stay (2)
- Appellee (3)
- Breach of contract (1)
- Child support appeals (1)
- Civil appeals (3)
- Comparative negligence (1)
- Complaint (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Connecticut Appellate Court (9)
- Connecticut Practice Book (8)
- Connecticut Rules of Appellate Procedure (8)
- Connecticut Supreme Court (2)
- Constructive notice (1)
- CORE 4 (3)
- Custody and visitation (1)
- Family appeals (4)
- Golding (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Issue preservation (4)
- Land use (1)
- Motion for articulation (1)
- Motion for review (1)
- Motion to dismiss (1)
- Motion to open (1)
- Motion to reargue (3)
- Negligence (2)
- Personal injury (2)
- Plain error (1)
- Pleadings (1)
- Plenary review (1)
- Post-judgment motions (4)
- Preliminary appeal papers (2)
- Premises liability (1)
- Probate appeals (1)
- Standing (2)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Subject matter jurisdiction (3)
- Supervisory authority (1)
- Trial court motions (2)
- Trial strategy (1)
- Unpreserved issues (1)
- Workers' compensation insurance law (1)
- Zoning (1)
- Firm News (16)
Category: Appellee
-
As we approach 2026, appellate attorneys and litigants in Connecticut should take time to familiarize themselves with the most recent amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure, which take effect on January 1, 2026. As with prior years, the amendments reflect a continued effort by the appellate courts to modernize practice, streamline procedures, and align rules with electronic filing realities. Some of
-
In North Branford Citizens Against Bulk Propane Storage v. Town of North Branford et al., the Connecticut Appellate Court considered a plaintiff-association’s challenge to a zoning regulation amendment that allowed the construction of a bulk propane storage facility in North Branford. In resolving the appeal, the Appellate Court relied on an unpreserved alternative ground for
-
What happens when the trial court’s reasoning falters on appeal? For appellees, alternative grounds for affirmance can save the day. Appellees must consider all possible bases for affirmance, including those not relied on by the trial court. By raising and briefing alternative grounds, appellees provide appellate courts with additional paths to uphold a decision. The