A Brief Review
A Connecticut Appellate Law Blog
TOPICS:
- A Brief Review (21)
- Abuse of discretion (2)
- Adequate record for review (4)
- Administrative appeal (1)
- Alternative grounds for affirmance (3)
- Appeal deadlines (1)
- Appellant (7)
- Appellate motions (4)
- Appellate process (8)
- Appellate stay (2)
- Appellee (3)
- Breach of contract (1)
- Child support appeals (1)
- Civil appeals (3)
- Comparative negligence (1)
- Complaint (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Connecticut Appellate Court (9)
- Connecticut Practice Book (8)
- Connecticut Rules of Appellate Procedure (8)
- Connecticut Supreme Court (2)
- Constructive notice (1)
- CORE 4 (3)
- Custody and visitation (1)
- Family appeals (4)
- Golding (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Issue preservation (4)
- Land use (1)
- Motion for articulation (1)
- Motion for review (1)
- Motion to dismiss (1)
- Motion to open (1)
- Motion to reargue (3)
- Negligence (2)
- Personal injury (2)
- Plain error (1)
- Pleadings (1)
- Plenary review (1)
- Post-judgment motions (4)
- Preliminary appeal papers (2)
- Premises liability (1)
- Probate appeals (1)
- Standing (2)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Subject matter jurisdiction (3)
- Supervisory authority (1)
- Trial court motions (2)
- Trial strategy (1)
- Unpreserved issues (1)
- Workers' compensation insurance law (1)
- Zoning (1)
- Firm News (16)
Category: Motion for review
-
The Connecticut Appellate Court’s decision in Villao v. Paz (officially released Sept. 30, 2025) offers rare published guidance on the Connecticut appellate stay in family cases. For family law and divorce attorneys, this opinion clarifies how the automatic appellate stay operates under Practice Book § 61-11 (c)—and reminds attorneys that the exceptions are narrowly construed.